Directed by: J.C. Chandor
Written by: Richard Wenk, Art Marcum, Matt Holloway
Ah, Marvel. The studio that once dared to innovate but now runs its storytelling through the Xerox machine labeled “Shakespearean Family Drama.” Kraven the Hunter is yet another entry in the franchise’s ongoing commitment to making every villain’s origin a watered-down tragedy instead of embracing, you know, actual villainy. Morbius 2022, Madame Web 2024, and now Kraven the Hunter 2024 are a line of film failures for the Sony and Marvel team up that is not be able to get decent writers. It is directly reflected in the box office and with audiences who expect more.
Here come the spoilers…
Following his mother’s death, young Sergei Kravinoff (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) is taken by his ruthless father, Nikolai (Russell Crowe), to be shaped into the heir of their family’s drug trafficking empire. During a fateful hunting trip in Ghana, Sergei is wounded while protecting his half-brother, Dmitri, from a lion, but a mysterious girl named Calypso saves him with a serum that grants him animalistic abilities. Disillusioned by his father’s cruelty, Sergei escapes to his mother’s sanctuary in Russia, severing ties with the man who sought to mold him into a killer. Sixteen years later, he resurfaces as Kraven, a vigilante dedicated to hunting criminals. When Dmitri is kidnapped by Aleksei Sytsevich, a mercenary who can transform into a monstrous rhino hybrid, Kraven and Calypso team up to rescue him, only to uncover a deeper conspiracy orchestrated by Nikolai. This leads to an inevitable showdown where Kraven ultimately orchestrates his father’s demise, seemingly putting an end to his family’s violent legacy.
Yet, the story refuses to let Kraven stand on his own, dragging him into yet another predictable father versus son retread. A year after Nikolai’s death, Kraven learns that Dmitri has embraced their father’s criminal ways and gained shapeshifting abilities, setting up a half-baked brotherly conflict that lacks both emotional weight and narrative tension. The real issue? The film fumbles its villain dynamics spectacularly. Instead of giving Kraven a compelling, singular antagonist, we get a revolving door of disposable mercenaries, corrupt businessmen, and forced familial drama. Kraven the Hunter wants to explore its protagonist’s torment, but it forgets to give him an enemy worth fighting. Without a true Big Bad to challenge him, Kraven’s story feels aimless—a hollow attempt at tragedy without the gravitas to make it compelling.
Here’s how this could’ve worked: introduce a Big Bad—a seemingly independent force working against Kraven, hunting him in parallel. Let the audience buy into this conflict for two acts, then drop the reveal that it was his younger brother pulling the strings all along. That’s how you build a rivalry with real emotional payoff. But don’t stop there—make dear old dad the puppet master who’s been playing both sides, revealed in a post-credits scene as the true mastermind… and then give us one more twist: he’s not even the top dog. There’s a greater force lurking, a power Kraven isn’t ready for, setting up a sequel that audiences might actually want to see.
Instead, we get Kraven: Daddy Issues Edition, a film so predictable that you could swap in Loki, Thor, T’Challa, Killmonger, Shang-Chi, or even Star-Lord and still have the same “Shakespearean tragedy lite” structure. At some point, Marvel and Sony need to realize that audiences have moved on. Not every villain needs to be humanized to death. Sometimes, we just want a badass hunter doing badass things without The Lion King playing in the background.
By the time the dust settles, Kraven isn’t a hunter—it’s the hunted, stalked by the ghosts of better films that came before it.
Thanks for reading Writing Movie “WRONGS.”